Question 1

What is NCEA AS 92012 about?

Accepted Answer

This is a 6-credit internal standard (assessed by your teacher, not an exam) where you design and build something real using materials — like a piece of furniture, a mechanical device, or a constructed object. You work from a brief (a description of what needs to be made and why), gather feedback from real people along the way, and use that feedback to improve your outcome. At the end, you judge how well your finished product does the job it was supposed to do.

Question 2

What do students need to do for AS 92012?

Accepted Answer

1. Write or use a brief that explains what you are making, who it is for, where it will be used, and what it needs to do — including specific, measurable requirements called specifications 2. Design and build a physical outcome (e.g. a wooden shelf, a mechanical device, a constructed object) that is fit for purpose 3. Consult at least two stakeholders (e.g. the end user, an expert) and collect documented feedback — written or recorded — during the making process 4. Use that feedback to make decisions about how to improve your outcome, and explain why you made those changes 5. At the end, judge your finished outcome against your original specifications and say whether each one was met or not met, and why

Question 3

What's the difference between Achieved, Merit, and Excellence for AS 92012?

Accepted Answer

Achieved: You build an outcome that is fit for purpose and meets the requirements of your brief and specifications. You have consulted stakeholders and collected their feedback. Merit: On top of Achieved, you clearly explain how the stakeholder feedback led to specific decisions and improvements in your outcome. You don't just say what changed — you explain why those changes made it better. Excellence: On top of Merit, you analyse in depth how stakeholder feedback shaped the whole development process, and you carefully evaluate your finished outcome against every specification, with evidence, in the real or intended setting. Your evaluation is thorough and honest, including where specs were not fully met.

Question 4

What mistakes do students typically make in AS 92012?

Accepted Answer

1. Not collecting stakeholder feedback first-hand or failing to document it properly — feedback must be recorded in writing or some other verifiable way 2. Only consulting one stakeholder instead of the required minimum of two 3. Writing specifications that are vague or not measurable — good specs need to be specific enough that you can clearly say 'met' or 'not met' at the end 4. Describing what changes were made but not explaining why those changes improved fitness for purpose (this is what separates Merit from Achieved) 5. Evaluating the outcome in general terms rather than going through each specification individually with evidence 6. Not testing or trialling the outcome in the actual or modelled intended environment when evaluating it

Materials design · AS 92012

7,157 students sat this in 2024 · 78% passed

Documents (3)

The standard itself

Bundles

Related standards

More in this subject

Other Materials and Processing Technology standards · Level 1 · Year 11